Différences

Ci-dessous, les différences entre deux révisions de la page.

--- en:whitepaper_wallet [2025/12/10 07:33] – créée dustethic
+++ en:whitepaper_wallet [2025/12/10 07:56] (Version actuelle) – dustethic
@@ Ligne 1: / Ligne 1: @@
-====== [2025-12-10] DustEthic - Wallet White Paper v1.0 (EN) ======
+====== DustEthic - Wallet White Paper v1.0 (EN) ======
+French version: [[fr:wallets-livre-blanc|Le Livre Blanc DustEthic - Wallets]]
-===== 0. Document status =====
+**Version**: 1.0-draft\\
+**Date**: 2025-12-10\\
+**Last updated**: 2025-12-10\\
-  * Version: v1.0 (working draft)
+----
-  * Scope: role of wallets in the DustEthic Standard
-  * Target audience: non custodial wallet product and tech teams, relayers, partners
+===== 0. Important disclaimer - document status =====
-  * Disclaimer: reference design, illustrative numbers only, no revenue or legal commitment.
+This document combines two types of information:
+  * **Current and verifiable elements**
+    * Description of the DustEthic Standard as published on the official repositories and on dustethic.org.
+    * Public technical references about wallets, account abstraction, ERC 4337, EIP 7702, paymasters, relayers, etc.
+  * **Projections, examples and design assumptions**
+    * All amounts, percentages, adoption rates, donation volumes, fee models, revenue scenarios and roadmaps are **working illustrations**.
+    * They do not describe the actual performance of any wallet, relayer, NGO or of the DustEthic project, and they may change or be discarded.
+As a result:
+  * This document is **not**:
+    * a promise of profit, yield or future performance,
+    * a financial product offering,
+    * a contractual commitment from DustEthic or from any partner.
+  * Each stakeholder (wallet, relayer, NGO, user) must:
+    * perform their own technical, legal, tax and regulatory checks,
+    * adapt or reject the examples if they do not fit their context.
+  * If there is any conflict between this document and:
+    * the DustEthic Standard published on the official repositories,
+    * or the most recent technical documentation, then **the most recent official sources** prevail.
+This document must be read as a **design and discussion support**, not as a final description of a production system.
 ----